Pancreaticobiliary fistula associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and the simultaneous ampullary carcinoma: A case report
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
RATIONALE: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) may perforate into adjacent organs, but pancreaticobiliary fistula caused by IPMN is rare. We present a rare case of pancreaticobiliary fistula due to a branch-duct IPMN, accelerated by a simultaneous ampullary carcinoma. PATIENT CONCERNS: A woman in her 70s developed obstructive jaundice and cholangitis after a year of follow-up for IPMN. DIAGNOSES: Imaging revealed a branch-duct IPMN with a mural nodule and dilation of the main pancreatic duct, along with a dilated distal bile duct. Perforation into the bile duct and lymphadenopathy were observed. Histopathology later confirmed a high-grade intestinal-type IPMN and an incidental ampullary ductal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent endoscopic biliary drainage followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy after improvement of cholangitis. OUTCOMES: The postoperative course was favorable. The pancreaticobiliary fistula was attributed to mechanical compression by mucin-producing IPMN, complicated by ampullary carcinoma. LESSONS: This case highlights the importance of recognizing synergistic effects of concurrent periampullary neoplasms. Surgical resection may be curative and necessary to control complex biliary obstruction and infection.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pancreaticobiliary fistula associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and the simultaneous ampullary carcinoma: A case report
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.