Outcomes of Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Azoospermic Men with Varicocele: A Prospective Analysis of 50 Cases
Rattachement africain : pk, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Varicocele is a common correctable cause of male infertility and has been associated with impaired spermatogenesis, including azoospermia. Microsurgical varicocelectomy is considered the gold standard for its treatment, as it has low complication rate, low chances of recurrence and high success rate. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgical varicocelectomy in restoring spermatogenesis in men with non-obstructive azoospermia secondary to varicocele. Methods: A total of 50 azoospermic patients with clinical varicocele underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy at Health Net Teaching Hospital, Hayatabad, Peshawar from August 2022 to August 2023. Semen analysis was repeated postoperatively at regular intervals after six months of surgery. Results: Out of the 50 patients, 27 (54%) showed the return of sperm in ejaculate after the procedure, indicating resumed spermatogenesis. The remaining 23 (46%) did not show any sperm in follow-up semen analyses. Conclusion: Microsurgical varicocelectomy appears to be an effective treatment option for a subset of azoospermic men with varicocele, with more than half demonstrating a return of sperm production postoperatively but mostly these patient lands on ARTs. Keywords: Microsurgical Varicocelectomy, Azoospermic Men, Varicocele
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Azoospermic Men with Varicocele: A Prospective Analysis of 50 Cases
- Date Crossref
- 28/12/2023
- Éditeur
- Lahore Medical and Dental College
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.