Do Rare Genetic Conditions Exhibit a Specific Phonotype? A Comprehensive Description of the Vocal Traits Associated with Crisponi/Cold-Induced Sweating Syndrome Type 1
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Perceptual analysis has highlighted that the voice characteristics of patients with rare congenital genetic syndromes differ from those of normophonic subjects. In this paper, we describe the voice phenotype, also called the phonotype, of patients with Crisponi/cold-induced sweating syndrome type 1 (CS/CISS1). Methods: We conducted an observational study at the Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Rome. Thirteen patients were included in this study (five males; mean age: 16 years; SD: 10.63 years; median age: 12 years; age range: 6–44 years), and five were adults (38%). We prospectively recorded and analyzed acoustical features of three corner vowels [a], [i], and [u]. For perceptual analysis, the GIRBAS (grade, instability, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain) scale was utilized. Acoustic analysis was performed through BioVoice software. Results: We found that CS/CISS1 patients share a common phonotype characterized by articulation disorders and hyper-rhinophonia. Conclusions: This study contributes to delineating the voice of CS/CISS1 syndrome. The phonotype can represent one of the earliest indicators for detecting rare congenital conditions, enabling specialists to reduce diagnosis time and better define a spectrum of rare and ultra-rare diseases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Do Rare Genetic Conditions Exhibit a Specific Phonotype? A Comprehensive Description of the Vocal Traits Associated with Crisponi/Cold-Induced Sweating Syndrome Type 1
- Date Crossref
- 26/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.