Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Isolated Brain Metastases: Temporal Trends and Prognostic Factors from the National Cancer Database (2010–2020)

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: The development of brain metastases (BM) is a relatively uncommon but significantly adverse event in the spread of colorectal cancer (CRC). Although management of CRC BM has improved with advances in imaging and systemic therapies, clinical outcomes remain poor. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. National Cancer Database to evaluate survival outcomes, treatment patterns, and prognostic factors in CRC patients diagnosed with BM between 2010 and 2020. Patients with isolated brain-only metastases formed the primary analytic cohort, while those with additional extracranial metastases were included for descriptive comparison. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with of survival. Proportional hazards assumptions were tested using Schoenfeld residuals. Accelerated failure time models were also employed. Results: From a cohort of 1,040,877 individuals with CRC, 795 had metastatic disease present along with relevant data, of which 296 had isolated BM. Median overall survival (mOS) in BM-only metastatic disease group was 7.82 months (95% CI: 5.82–9.66). The longest survival was observed among patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery combined with systemic therapy (SRS+Sys), with a median OS of 23.26 months (95% CI: 17.51–41.95) and a 3-year survival rate of 35.8%. In adjusted Cox models, SRS, systemic therapy, and definitive surgery of the primary site were each independently associated with reduced hazard of death. Rectal cancer patients had longer survival than those with colon primaries (mOS: 10.35 vs. 6.08 months). Age, comorbidity burden, and insurance status were not associated with survival in adjusted analyses. Conclusions: SRS+Sys was associated with longer survival compared to other treatment strategies. However, treatment selection is highly dependent on individual clinical factors such as performance status, comorbidities, and disease extent; therefore, these findings must be interpreted with caution Future prospective studies incorporating molecular and biomarker data are warranted to better guide care in this rare and high-risk group.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.