COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CRYOTHERAPY AND INTRALESIONAL VITAMIN D3 IN PATIENTS WITH PLANTAR WARTS
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Plantar warts, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), are common and often resistant to treatment. While cryotherapy is a standard approach, intralesional vitamin D3 has emerged as a newer, immunomodulatory option. Comparative evidence regarding their efficacy remains limited. Objective: To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy and intralesional vitamin D3 in the treatment of plantar warts. Study Design: randomized controlled trial. Setting: Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Nowshera. Duration of Study: 02-December-2024 to 02-June-2025. Methods: A total of 194 patients aged 15–45 years presenting with 1–3 plantar warts were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n = 97) received cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen biweekly for six weeks. Group B (n = 97) received intralesional vitamin D3 (0.2 mL of 7.5 mg/mL) at the same interval. Treatment efficacy was defined as complete clinical clearance of all warts by six weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using a chi-square test; p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age was 31.55 ± 9.35 years in Group A and 32.23 ± 8.37 years in Group B. Cryotherapy showed a significantly higher clearance rate of 66.0% compared to 45.4% with intralesional vitamin D3 (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Cryotherapy is considerably more effective than intralesional vitamin D3 in achieving complete resolution of plantar warts over six weeks, and should be preferred as a first-line treatment in clinical practice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CRYOTHERAPY AND INTRALESIONAL VITAMIN D3 IN PATIENTS WITH PLANTAR WARTS
- Date Crossref
- 14/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Medeye Publishers
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.