Integrative network pharmacology and multi-omics reveal anisodamine hydrobromide’s multi-target mechanisms in sepsis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sepsis, marked by hyperinflammation and subsequent immunosuppression, lacks effective phase-specific therapies. Although anisodamine hydrobromide (Ani HBr) reduced 28-day mortality in our prior trial, its mechanisms remained unclear. Here, we integrated network pharmacology, machine learning, immunological profiling, molecular simulations, and single-cell transcriptomics to elucidate Ani HBr's multi-target actions. Among 30 cross-species targets, ELANE and CCL5 emerged as core regulators via protein interaction networks, survival modeling (AUC: 0.72-0.95), and statistical significance (p < 0.05). Ani HBr inhibited ELANE-driven NET formation (HR = 1.176), associated with immunosuppression and endothelial damage, while enhancing CCL5-related cytotoxic T-cell recruitment (HR = 0.810). Docking and dynamics simulations showed Ani HBr binds ELANE's catalytic cleft, suggesting direct inhibition of its enzymatic activity, and interacts stably with CCL5 at potential receptor-binding interfaces, indicating a modulatory role. Single-cell analysis revealed ELANE upregulation in CCI-phase neutrophils and widespread yet stage-specific CCL5 expression. These findings support Ani HBr as a phase-tailored agent that targets ELANE in early hyperinflammation while preserving CCL5-mediated immunity. The ELANE/CCL5 prognostic model offers a framework for precision immunotherapy in sepsis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integrative network pharmacology and multi-omics reveal anisodamine hydrobromide’s multi-target mechanisms in sepsis
- Date Crossref
- 31/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.