Real-world adherence trajectories to direct oral anticoagulants in naive patients with atrial fibrillation in Spain
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aims: This study aimed to identify adherence trajectories and associated factors in atrial fibrillation patients who initiated direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy, using population-based data from the Catalonia and Valencia regions in Spain during a 2-year follow-up. Methods and Results: Group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM) was applied to assess adherence patterns in cohorts comprising 14,641 patients in Catalonia and 13,211 in Valencia. Adherence trajectories were categorised based on prescription data, revealing three main trajectories in Valencia and five in Catalonia. Most patients in Valencia demonstrated high adherence, whereas Catalonia showed more varied patterns, including early, gradual, and late declines. Factors associated with non-adherence included high co-insurance levels, alcohol use, and specific DOACs, such as dabigatran. Conclusion: Adherence trajectories differed between the two regions, with three identified in Valencia and five in Catalonia. Shared non-adherence patterns were observed across both cohorts, while Catalonia exhibited additional noncompliance trends. Key factors associated with non-adherence included socio-economic variables, clinical characteristics, and the type of DOAC prescribed. Understanding these patterns is essential for developing targeted intervention strategies to improve adherence and optimise treatment outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Real-world adherence trajectories to direct oral anticoagulants in naive patients with atrial fibrillation in Spain
- Date Crossref
- 31/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.