Clinical Efficacy of Canrenone in Restoring Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation—A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Background and aims Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition is an upstream therapy for managing atrial fibrillation (AF). Of all RAAS-inhibiting agents, only canrenone in the form of potassium canrenoate, a specific inhibitor of mineralocorticoid receptors, is administered intravenously. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of intravenous potassium canrenoate in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF episodes. Methods This double-center, randomized, double-blind study comprised 52 patients with AF (lasting <48 h) in stable cardiopulmonary conditions who were eligible for cardioversion. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a slow intravenous bolus of 10 ml either as a placebo (0.9% saline) or canrenone (200 mg). The primary endpoint was the return of sinus rhythm within 2 h after drug administration. Results Of 52 patients, 27 (51.9%) and 25 (48.1%) were treated with placebo and canrenone, respectively. The median patient age was 68 years, and 27 patients (51.9%) were men. Sinus rhythm restoration during the follow-up period occurred in 3 (11.5%) and 4 (16.0%) patients in the placebo and canrenone arms ( P = .477), respectively. Adverse events were observed in 2 (7.4%) and 0 (0.0%) patients in the placebo and canrenone arms, respectively ( P = .170). Conclusions Intravenous canrenone is not effective in the sinus rhythm restoration among the patients with paroxysmal AF. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03536806
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical Efficacy of Canrenone in Restoring Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation—A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.