Triple-effect correction for Cell Painting data with contrastive and domain-adversarial learning
Résumé fourni par la source
Cell Painting (CP), as a high-throughput imaging technology, generates extensive cell-stained imaging data, providing unique morphological insights for biological research. However, CP data contains three types of technical effects, referred to as triple effects, including batch effects, gradient-influenced row and column effects (well-position effects). The interaction of various technical effects can obscure true biological signals and complicate the characterization of CP data, making correction essential for reliable analysis. Here, we propose cpDistiller, a triple-effect correction method specially designed for CP data, which leverages a pre-trained segmentation model coupled with a semi-supervised Gaussian mixture variational autoencoder utilizing contrastive and domain-adversarial learning. Through extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments across various CP profiles, we demonstrate that cpDistiller effectively corrects triple effects, especially well-position effects, while preserving cellular heterogeneity. Moreover, cpDistiller effectively captures system-level phenotypic responses to genetic perturbations and reliably infers gene functions and interactions both when combined with scRNA-seq data and independently. cpDistiller also demonstrates promising capability for identifying gene and compound targets, highlighting its potential utility in drug discovery and broader biological research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Triple-effect correction for Cell Painting data with contrastive and domain-adversarial learning
- Date Crossref
- 25/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.