Proximity Extension Assay identifies new targets of grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis
Rattachement africain : nl, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Grey matter (GM) lesions and atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) are strongly correlated to disease progression and cognitive decline, but molecular mechanisms underlying GM lesion formation remain unclear. Various studies have used a proteomics approach to study changes in cerebrospinal fluid or blood. However, very few studies have been performed in tissue and especially GM lesions are understudied, despite the importance of these lesions in disease progression. For this explorative study, we applied Olink proteomics to unravel differentially expressed proteins in the GM of MS patients (n = 9) compared to controls (n = 10). First, we evaluated which of the 184 proteins in a neurology and inflammation panel could accurately distinguish MS from control by applying a classifier based on unbiased variable selection. The classifier consisted of five proteins: HGF, PVR, NEP, EFNA4 and LAP.TGF.beta1. These were all differentially expressed in GMLs of MS patients (FDR < 0.1), amongst twelve others. Additionally, we studied proteomic changes between MS cases with different GM lesion loads and identified IL-20, CD5 and GZMA to distinguish large from small lesions. Eight other proteins were nominally differentially expressed based on lesion load. Future studies should explore the potential of targeting these proteins to hamper grey matter pathology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Proximity Extension Assay identifies new targets of grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.