Intense Optimization of Oral Therapy Rapidly Restores Respiratory Function in Worsening Heart Failure Patients
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Aims Breathlessness is the primary symptom of decompensated heart failure (HF), but the prevalence and evolution of persistent respiratory distress post-hospitalization remain unclear. Methods and results The Longitudinal Observational Study for mIddle Term Follow-up Patients Admitted for Acute Dyspnea in TunIsia (SIDI) study is a prospective and multicentre study on HF patients with preserved ejection fraction admitted for acute dyspnoea. Patients were followed for 6 months. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of persistent respiratory distress and factors linked to respiratory recovery at Day 90. The secondary endpoint was rehospitalization and/or death at Day 90 and 180. Among 231 patients, 140 had SpO2 and respiratory rate data at Day 90. Persistent respiratory distress was observed in 97 (69%). Multivariable analysis found no association between respiratory recovery and sex, diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease or NT-proBNP levels. However, intensive follow-up (n = 54) with oral neuroendocrine inhibition significantly improved respiratory parameters at Day 90 (adjusted HR: 5.70 [95% CI 2.13–18.28], P = 0.0001) compared with standard follow-up (n = 86) and reduced rehospitalization and/or death at Day 90 and 180. Conclusions Persistent respiratory distress is frequent in the months following HF hospitalization. Optimized guideline-directed therapy and close follow-up improve respiratory recovery. SpO2 and respiratory rate monitoring should be integrated into HF management.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intense Optimization of Oral Therapy Rapidly Restores Respiratory Function in Worsening Heart Failure Patients
- Date Crossref
- 28/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.