Orographic and land-sea contrast effects in convection-permitting simulations of extreme sub-daily precipitation

Résumé fourni par la source

Convection-permitting climate models (CPMs) represent a significant advancement compared to regional climate models, enabling more accurate simulations of extreme precipitation at fine spatial and temporal scales. Assessing the reliability of CPM projections for extreme short-duration precipitation requires understanding how well CPMs reproduce observed extremes—especially in Mediterranean regions, where such evaluations are rare. In this study, we assess the accuracy of simulations from a high-resolution CPM covering the entire Italy (VHR-PRO_IT), in reproducing sub-daily precipitation extremes. For this, we exploit observations from I 2 -RED, a comprehensive dataset of more than 5000 quality-checked rain gauge observations. The comparison is performed by considering the median values of the annual maxima at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24-hour as a first step and rainfall quantiles up to 200-year return period as a second step. Our results show that model performance is influenced by both the distance from the coastline and elevation, highlighting an important role of orography and land-sea contrast in explaining CPM biases. Moreover, we find better performances when longer duration extremes are considered, while shorter durations are affected by strong underestimations, especially in coastal and low-elevation areas. These results hold significant implications for stakeholders and policymakers dealing with climate adaptation and flood risk management.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.