Evaluation of the impact of defining observable time in real-world data on outcome incidence
Rattachement africain : us, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: In real-world data (RWD), defining the observation period-the time during which a patient is considered observable-is critical for estimating incidence rates (IRs) and other outcomes. Yet, in the absence of explicit enrollment information, this period must often be inferred, introducing potential bias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluates methods for defining observation periods and their impact on IR estimates across multiple database types. We applied 3 methods for defining observation periods: (1) a persistence + surveillance window approach, (2) an age- and gender-adjusted method based on time between healthcare events, and (3) the min/max method. These were tested across 11 RWD databases, including both enrollment-based and encounter-based sources. Enrollment time was used as the reference standard in eligible databases. To assess the impact on epidemiologic results, we replicated a prior study of adverse event incidence, comparing IRs and calculating mean squared error between methods. RESULTS: Incidence rates decreased as observation periods lengthened, driven by increases in the person-time denominator. The persistence + surveillance method produced estimates closest to enrollment-based rates when appropriately balanced. The min/max approach yielded inconsistent results, particularly in encounter-based databases, with greater error observed in databases with longer time spans. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that assumptions about data completeness and population observability significantly affect incidence estimates. Observation period definitions substantially influence outcome measurement in RWD studies. CONCLUSION: Standardized, transparent approaches are necessary to ensure valid, reproducible results-especially in databases lacking defined enrollment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of the impact of defining observable time in real-world data on outcome incidence
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Johnson & Johnson (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Erasmus MC pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Columbia University Department of Biomedical Informatics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of California Department of Biostatistics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Coordinating Center pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Erasmus University Medical Center Department of Medical Informatics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Johnson & Johnson (United States), Erasmus MC et Department of Biomedical Informatics — Columbia University, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.