Three‐Year Recurrence in People With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Is Comparable to Cancer
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aimed to compare the 3-year recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and the rate of endovascular reintervention for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) to recurrence rates of advanced-stage cancers. We systematically collected original data reporting 3-year DFU recurrence from studies published through 2024 and calculated a pooled mean. These findings were compared to recurrence rates for advanced breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers using contemporary sources from the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society. CLTI reintervention data were drawn from the BEST-CLI trial. The pooled 3-year DFU recurrence rate was 58%, while the CLTI reintervention rate was 50%-comparable to cancer recurrence rates: breast (25%-40%), prostate (30%-40%), colorectal (30%-50%), and lung (60%-80%). Despite these comparable risks, DFU and CLTI remain underrecognized in terms of their recurrent burden on individuals, families, and health systems. The data presented here underscore the need to reframe healed DFU and post-intervention CLTI not as an endpoint but as a remission-a state requiring structured surveillance and proactive management, much like in oncology. Developing interdisciplinary survivorship care plans for individuals with DFU and CLTI, modelled on those used in cancer care, may improve communication, enhance secondary prevention, and foster more ulcer-free, hospital-free, and activity-rich days.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Three‐Year Recurrence in People With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Is Comparable to Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.