Parallel Ghost Imaging with Extra Large Field of View and High Pixel Resolution
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Ghost imaging (GI) facilitates image acquisition under low-light conditions through single pixel measurements, thus holding tremendous potential across various fields such as biomedical imaging, remote sensing, defense and military applications, and 3D imaging. However, in order to reconstruct high-resolution images, GI typically requires a large number of single-pixel measurements, which imposes practical limitations on its application. Parallel ghost imaging addresses this issue by utilizing each pixel of a position-sensitive detector as a bucket detector to simultaneously perform tens of thousands of ghost imaging measurements in parallel. In this work, we explore the non-local characteristics of ghost imaging in depth, and by constructing a large speckle space, we achieve a reconstruction result in parallel ghost imaging where the field of view surpasses the limitations of the reference arm detector. Using a computational ghost imaging framework, after pre-recording the speckle patterns, we are able to complete X-ray ghost imaging at a speed of 6 min per sample, with image dimensions of 14,000 × 10,000 pixels (4.55 mm × 3.25 mm, millimeter-scale field of view) and a pixel resolution of 0.325 µm (sub-micron pixel resolution). We present this framework to enhance efficiency, extend resolution, and dramatically expand the field of view, with the aim of providing a solution for the practical implementation of ghost imaging.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Parallel Ghost Imaging with Extra Large Field of View and High Pixel Resolution
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.