Evaluation of renal masses with CEST MRI : Protocol optimization and preliminary results
Rattachement africain : us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Purpose This study investigates the application of CEST MRI in human kidneys, with the overarching goal of developing CEST MRI for renal mass characterization. Here, the focus is on the development of a protocol and the proof‐of‐principle evaluation of CEST for the characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods Ten healthy volunteers and five patients diagnosed with ccRCC underwent CEST MRI scans at 3 T. The sequence performance was characterized in healthy volunteers and tested using three saturation power levels, B1rms = 0.7, 1.2, and 1.6 μT. We compared the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) values at 1.0, 2.0, and 3.5 ppm between the kidney cortex of healthy volunteers and the cortex/renal masses of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. We also investigated the correlation of CEST with tumor characteristics, such as volume, necrosis percentage, and histopathological grade. Results Significant differences in MTRasym values were observed between ccRCC tumor regions and healthy kidney cortex in all three compared frequency offset ranges (p < 0.05). At the same time, MTRasym values in the cortex of the contralateral kidney in RCC patients were not significantly different when compared with the values of healthy kidney cortex values (p > 0.7). Conclusion CEST MRI demonstrates considerable potential as a non‐invasive imaging tool for the characterization of renal masses.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of renal masses with <scp>CEST MRI</scp>: Protocol optimization and preliminary results
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.