A probiotic bacterium modulates antitumor γδ T-cell responses in lung cancer
Rattachement africain : jp, ca, gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT The link between the intestinal microflora and cancer outcomes has been recognized for over a decade. Several recent studies have demonstrated that the gut microbiome is associated with the efficiency of T-cell checkpoint blockade therapy for cancer raising interest in strategies to harness this effect via consumption of live microorganisms (probiotics). The probiotic Clostridium butyricum strain MIYAIRI 588 (CBM588) enhances both response rates and overall survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma but the mechanism underpinning this benefit remains unclear. Here, we show that CBM588 spores induce a population of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells from the peripheral blood of healthy donors and lung cancer patients. A subset of these T-cells responded to, and directly lysed, cancer cell lines via a butyrophilin 3A-dependant mechanism. In patients taking CBM588 alongside checkpoint blockade, peripheral Vδ2⁺ T-cells expressed the activation marker CD69 more frequently than those receiving checkpoint blockade alone and the frequency of Vδ2⁺CD69⁺ cells increased following initiation of CBM588 treatment (p = 0.0041). Our findings provide a potential mechanism by which the manipulation of the intestinal microflora might directly contribute to cancer prognosis by activating immune effector cells with intrinsic anticancer properties.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A probiotic bacterium modulates antitumor γδ T-cell responses in lung cancer
- Date Crossref
- 19/07/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.