Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners’ communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Patients can benefit when primary care practitioners communicate clinical empathy and optimism during consultations, but previous training interventions for practitioners are overly time-consuming and evidence on patient outcomes is limited. This study assessed the feasibility of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in UK general practice to evaluate effects of a new brief digital learning package in empathy and optimism (EMPathicO) for primary care practitioners. METHODS: The study ran January to October 2020, with COVID-19 related modifications (mostly, practitioner and patient data had to be collected separately) from March 2020. 9 practices and 12 primary care practitioners recruited from UK (Southern England, Midlands). 12 practitioners completed EMPathicO training and 11 completed qualitative telephone interviews. Patients recruited through social media completed web-based questionnaires at baseline (<2 weeks post-consultation) and 2-week follow-up (n = 437). Purposively sampled patients completed qualitative telephone interviews (n = 30). Data analysed descriptively and thematically. RESULTS: Practitioners were keen to reflect on and enhance communication skills and were willing to undertake digital training, even during COVID-19 pandemic. However, some practices and practitioners would have declined if video-recording consultations was a mandatory aid to reflection during training. Practitioners found EMPathicO brief, relevant and engaging and could implement techniques taught in the training. Patients found the online questionnaires acceptable, though retention was suboptimal at 57%; minor easily remedied feasibility and process issues were identified (including incentivizing participation); and patients were enthusiastic about research to improve communication. CONCLUSIONS: An agile research strategy enabled useful feasibility data to be collected despite the challenges of the COVID pandemic. It is feasible to proceed to a full trial of the effects of EMPathicO on patient outcomes in primary care, if video-recording consultations is optional not mandatory. Feasibility work to develop and test sophisticated questionnaire structures is valuable when planning primary care patient surveys. Registration: ISRCTN21215037. Registered: 06/02/2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21215037.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners’ communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism
- Date Crossref
- 18/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Southampton Primary Care Research Centre pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Oxford pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Keele University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Philosophy pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Primary Care Research Centre — University of Southampton, University of Oxford et NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.