Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Comparative Analysis of Fusion and Decompression Surgery in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
24Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance and clinical value of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) in predicting postoperative paralysis in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), specifically on stratifying true-positive alerts in fusion versus decompression surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Tc-MEP monitoring is widely used to detect intraoperative motor deficits, but its accuracy and predictive value in different surgical approaches remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3813 patients with DCM who underwent cervical spine surgery were analyzed. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as a ≥70% reduction in amplitude. Postoperative paralysis was categorized as upper limb palsy or lower limb palsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Tc-MEP alerts were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors of true-positive alerts. RESULTS: Postoperative motor paralysis occurred in 1.36% (52/3778) of cases. The Tc-MEP sensitivity was 57.7%, specificity 93.2%, PPV 10.6%, and NPV 99.4%. Fusion surgery had a significantly higher postoperative paralysis rate [3.7% in posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) vs. 0.8% in posterior decompression alone]. Fusion surgery was an independent predictor of true-positive alerts (OR=4.62, 95% CI: 1.69-12.66), while nonattributed alerts were the primary cause of false positives (OR=0.036, 95% CI: 0.004-0.37). CONCLUSION: Tc-MEP alerts showed higher PPV in fusion surgery, reflecting the greater risk profile in these procedures. However, the consistently high NPV across all surgical approaches supports the broad utility of Tc-MEP in ensuring intraoperative neurological safety. This study provides the first large scale, stratified analysis of Tc-MEP alert outcomes in fusion versus decompression surgery, offering actionable insights for intraoperative neuromonitoring in complex DCM cases.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Analysis of Fusion and Decompression Surgery in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials
Date Crossref
17/07/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsCervical and Thoracic MyelopathySpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.