Aller au contenu principal
2025 review

Comparative Efficacy of Treatment Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis D Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection with pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha) is associated with variable and often poor treatment responses. Recently, bulevirtide was approved for chronic HDV infection with promising results. METHODS: IU/mL decrease from baseline), biochemical response (ALT normalisation) and combined response (defined as fulfilment of both virological and biochemical responses), measured at end of treatment and 24 weeks post-treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for analysis. RESULTS: Data from 934 patients in 6 randomised studies showed that, at the end of treatment, bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was more likely to achieve virological response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha (OR, 8.39; 95% CI: 3.46, 20.37) and bulevirtide (OR, 6.31; 95% CI: 3.17, 12.59). Bulevirtide 10 mg plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was more likely to achieve virological response compared to bulevirtide 2 mg plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy at the end of treatment (OR, 2.43; 95% CI: 1.16, 5.09). Bulevirtide 10 mg (OR, 4.43; 95% CI: 1.17, 16.83) and bulevirtide 2 mg (OR, 10.95; 95% CI: 2.51, 47.74) were more likely to achieve biochemical response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha at the end of treatment, but bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was not (OR, 3.24; 95% CI: 0.84, 12.50). At 24 weeks post-treatment, bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was more likely to result in virological response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha (OR, 3.69; 95% CI: 1.05, 12.98) and bulevirtide (OR, 2.79; 95% CI: 1.13, 6.92), as well as biochemical response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha (OR, 3.23; 95% CI: 1.38, 7.56). Bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was more likely to result in combined response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha (OR, 6.06; 95% CI: 2.03, 18.05) and bulevirtide (OR, 4.67; 95% CI: 2.21, 9.85) at the end of treatment. At 24 weeks post-treatment, neither bulevirtide monotherapy nor bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapies at various doses were more likely to achieve combined response compared to PEG-IFN-alpha. CONCLUSIONS: Bulevirtide plus PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy was superior in achieving virological response, both in magnitude and duration, compared to bulevirtide or PEG-IFN-alpha monotherapies in patients with chronic HDV infection.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Efficacy of Treatment Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis D Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis
Date Crossref
16/07/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Hepatitis C virus researchHepatitis B Virus StudiesHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.