Understanding what works for Pacific people in health education programmes: a clinician's perspective
Résumé fourni par la source
Purpose of review Pacific people face higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiac, respiratory conditions, and cancer. Health education programmes are a key intervention in supporting self-management of chronic conditions for Pacific people. However, provision and access to healthcare remains challenging for Pacific people, impeded by multiple factors. This review aims to provide an update on current evidence around Pacific people's experiences of Health education programmes and considerations for clinicians. Recent findings There is limited literature regarding Pacific peoples lived experiences of health education programmes. However, recent literature suggests that interweaving Pacific models of health (unique way of viewing health and wellbeing), understanding clinicians’ knowledge around Pacific health attitudes and beliefs and health services developing and reviewing their health education programmes through co-design with Pacific communities is imperative in being able to serve Pacific peoples chronic health needs and reduce the equity gap in health education and self-management. Summary Applying Pacific models of health in collaboration with Pacific communities during the development and creation of health education programmes will ensure that education is targeted and relevant for Pacific people's unique worldview of health and wellbeing.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Understanding what works for Pacific people in health education programmes: a clinician's perspective
- Date Crossref
- 15/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.