Land Use Changes and Their Impacts on Soil Erosion in a Fragile Ecosystem of the Ethiopian Highlands
Rattachement africain : us, Éthiopie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Land cover changes have significant implications for ecosystem services, influencing agricultural productivity, soil stability, hydrological processes, and biodiversity. This study assesses the impacts of land use and land cover (LULC) change on soil erosion in the Upper Guder River catchment, Ethiopia, from 1986 to 2020. We analyzed Landsat imagery for three periods (1986, 2002, and 2020), achieving a classification accuracy of 89.21% and a kappa coefficient of 0.839. Using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model, we quantified spatial and temporal variations in soil erosion. Over the study period, cultivated land expanded from 51.89% to 78.40%, primarily at the expense of shrubland and grassland, which declined to 6.61% and 2.98%, respectively. Forest cover showed a modest decline, from 13.60% to 11.24%, suggesting a partial offset by reforestation efforts. Built-up areas nearly tripled, reflecting increasing anthropogenic pressure. Mean annual soil loss increased markedly from 107.63 to 172.85 t ha−1 yr−1, with cultivated land exhibiting the highest erosion rates (199.5 t ha−1 yr−1 in 2020). Severe erosion (>50 t ha−1 yr−1) was concentrated on steep slopes under intensive cultivation. These findings emphasize the urgent need for integrated land management strategies that stabilize erosion-prone landscapes while improving agricultural productivity and ecological resilience.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Land Use Changes and Their Impacts on Soil Erosion in a Fragile Ecosystem of the Ethiopian Highlands
- Date Crossref
- 16/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.