Sexual and gender minoritized persons in organ and tissue donation: a qualitative analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Sexual and gender minoritized persons (SGMs) experience inequities, harms, and gaps in care in organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) systems. The experiences of SGMs navigating OTDT have not been published from their own perspectives. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews, transcribed verbatim, and performed a formal qualitative best-fit framework synthesis and inductive thematic analysis with an SGM OTDT patient and caregiver advisory team (N = 12/13) to characterize their self-described experiences. RESULTS: Emergent themes included: 1) stigma, discriminatory criteria, and inertia to change; 2) OTDT patient and community relations; 3) benefits, strength, and resilience of the SGM community; and 4) SGM priorities and opportunities for improvement. Each theme and its respective subthemes are presented with representative quotes. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel findings detail the ways that SGMs experience OTDT health care, highlighting the harms of discriminatory donor risk assessment criteria and the need for equitable policy revision. Opportunities to enhance inclusive care include institutional acknowledgement of inequities and transparent communication, target training for health care providers, and intersectional SGM and OTDT caregiver support networks.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Sexual and gender minoritized persons in organ and tissue donation: a qualitative analysis Les personnes issues des minorités sexuelles et de genre dans le don d’organes et de tissus : une analyse qualitative
- Date Crossref
- 15/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.