Phase 2 Trial of Long-Acting Cabotegravir and VRC07-523LS for Viral Suppression in Adults With HIV-1: ACTG A5357

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Long-acting regimens are needed to expand antiretroviral therapy (ART) options for people with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Combining broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) with long-acting small-molecule antiretrovirals may offer an alternative to daily oral therapy. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2, open-label, single-arm trial at AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) sites across the United States. Eligible adults had HIV-1 virologically suppressed on ART for ≥2 years, CD4 count ≥350 cells/μL, and susceptibility to VRC07-523LS (half-maximal inhibitory concentration ≤0.25 µg/mL; inhibition >98%). Participants completed an oral cabotegravir (CAB) lead-in (Step 1), then received intravenous VRC07-523LS (40 mg/kg every 8 weeks) plus intramuscular CAB-LA (every 4 weeks) for 48 weeks (Step 2), followed by a return to standard ART (Step 3). Primary outcomes were treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuation, and confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL by week 44. Virologic efficacy was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Seventy-four participants were enrolled (median age, 54 years; 26% female; 51% non-Hispanic White). Twelve (17%) experienced a primary safety event: 11 (15%) had grade ≥3 AEs, primarily transient infusion reactions, and 1 discontinued due to a grade 1 infusion event. The cumulative probability of virologic failure by week 44 was 7% (95% confidence interval, 3%-16%). One participant developed the R263K integrase resistance mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The VRC07-523LS plus CAB-LA regimen maintained viral suppression in 93% of participants, with only transient infusion reactions observed; however, instances of virologic breakthrough suggest that future studies should focus on optimizing efficacy outcomes. These results support continued investigation of bNAb-based long-acting ART combinations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.