Successful pembrolizumab treatment in a patient with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
RATIONALE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally considered to be ineffective in chemotherapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer. We encountered an ALK-positive lung cancer patient who responded well to pembrolizumab. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 70-year-old man presented with a chest shadow. DIAGNOSIS: A mass shadow in the left lower lung field was diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma cT2N3M1b stage IVA. ALK staining by immunohistochemistry was strongly positive (3+), and fluorescence in situ hybridization detected ALK rearrangements. Immunostaining showed that 95% of tumor cells expressed programmed death ligand-1 (22C3 clones). INTERVENTIONS: First-line therapy with alectinib was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement and a partial response (PR), which progressed after 14 months. The patient continued to receive various medications; however, the tumor gradually increased in size. Therefore, pembrolizumab was initiated as the 8th-line treatment and was effective. OUTCOMES: The tumor shrank after 2 cycles of pembrolizumab, and the patient achieved PR. Nine months later, the patient has maintained PR. LESSONS: Few case reports have described the successful treatment of ALK-positive lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We herein present a rare case of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma that responded to pembrolizumab monotherapy as the 8th-line treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Successful pembrolizumab treatment in a patient with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review
- Date Crossref
- 11/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.