Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Seizure monitoring by combined diary and wearable data: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: In patients with intractable epilepsy, accurate diaries of seizure occurrence and timing can substantially inform management. Wearable devices that provide confirmation of seizure occurrence complement such diaries, which are frequently incomplete and/or inaccurate. Here, we combined seizure diaries and longitudinally deployed wrist-worn device recordings to evaluate whether wearable recordings contain information that can discriminate between days containing seizure-related activity and those without. METHODS: Patients with focal seizures were prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial to test the effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate as an adjunct to levetiracetam or lamotrigine (phase IV clinical trial NCT03116828). One hundred two patients maintained a seizure diary and wore a biosensor for >30 weeks. Based on diaries, we labeled days as either "seizure" versus "no-seizure" or "preseizure" versus "no-preseizure." We compared patterns obtained by harmonic 24-h modeling between conditions. Best-ranking wearable markers and seizure diary variables were fed into a fully connected neural network, with several hidden layers and depth as hyperparameters that classified between seizure day conditions. RESULTS: The final sample contained 70 patients (median age = 42.5 years, 43 female) with 5437 recorded patient-days, including 557 seizure days and 537 preseizure days. Twenty-four-hour patterns in electrodermal activity and accelerometry differentiated no-seizure versus seizure days, as well as no-preseizure versus preseizure days (p < .01). Classification between no-seizure and seizure days (weighted F1 = .81, sensitivity = .82, specificity = .67) as well as between no-preseizure and preseizure days (weighted F1 = .82, sensitivity = .80, specificity = .66) revealed good performance. SIGNIFICANCE: Wearable data capture seizure-related differences with daily resolution, differentiating between days with lower and higher seizure susceptibility. Combining diary-based clinical and wearable data bears the potential for developing a dynamic seizure detection and prediction system with daily resolution.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Seizure monitoring by combined diary and wearable data: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study
Date Crossref
12/07/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentSleep and Wakefulness Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.