Bridging generational gaps in Surgery: A narrative review on values, well-being, and training preferences

Le résumé fourni par la source

Intergenerational differences in surgery create both challenges and opportunities. While differening perspectives and expectations may deter younger generations from pursuing surgical careers, it is crucial to balance these with the core values that define the surgical profession. This narrative review was conducted to better understand how the profession needs to evolve. A structured literature search on generational changes in surgery was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Relevant search terms were employed, covering (i) surgeons/surgery, (ii) generation/cohort and (ii) culture/identity/behaviour. After independent title and abstract screening by three authors, consensus was reached to include relevant studies published in English up to November 2023. Full-text evaluation led to an inclusion of 50 studies, reviewed for returning themes. Identified themes included: generations (n = 9), work engagement (n = 8), work-life balance (n = 7), training and education (n = 4) and attractiveness of the profession (n = 8). An additional 14 relevant studies were included based on reference lists and external sources. This review summarizes key factors contributing to surgical well-being and generational dynamics. Awareness of these factors is increasing. While generational differences exist, many distinctions may be attributed to life phases, lifestyles or systemic changes in the past decades. Addressing these topics daily can foster intergenerational dialogue and a supportive environment for future surgeons. • This review summarizes key factors contributing to generational dynamics. • Key factors: work engagement, work-life-balance, training/education, attractiveness. • Life phase, lifestyles or systemic changes in the past decades also matter. • Awareness of factors contributing to surgical well-being/generations is increasing. • Intergenerational dialogue contributes to bridging generational gaps in surgery.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.