Research productivity of ophthalmology residents in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive analysis
Rattachement africain : ca, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the research productivity of ophthalmology residents in Saudi Arabia and identify factors associated with significant research output. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of ophthalmology training programs across Saudi Arabia from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: The study included 225 ophthalmology residents, with a mean number of publications of 3.25 ± 4.59 and an average h-index of 1.20 ± 1.38. Statistically significant differences were observed between training programs in the mean number of publications ( P < 0.001), h-index ( P < 0.001), and citations ( P < 0.001). The programs with the highest mean publication counts were King Saud University (8.03 ± 8.00), King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (3.80 ± 3.87), and the Eastern program (3.07 ± 4.04). Residents pursuing subspecialty fellowships, particularly in oculoplastic surgery and cornea, exhibited higher research output. Furthermore, the mean number of publications ( P < 0.001), citations ( P < 0.001), and h-index ( P < 0.001) were associated with attaining future academic positions. Pursuing fellowship was significantly linked to the number of publications ( P = 0.009) and h-index ( P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the variability in research productivity among ophthalmology residents and highlights the influence of training programs, fellowship ambitions, and academic aspirations on research output.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Research productivity of ophthalmology residents in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive analysis
- Date Crossref
- 09/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.