Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparative Analysis of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Versus Descemetorhexis Without Keratoplasty (DSO) in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: This retrospective observational study evaluates the efficacy of Descemetorhexis without Keratoplasty (DSO) compared to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in the management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD). The outcomes were compared in terms of the corneal anatomical changes, visual results, and complication rates between the two surgical techniques for FECD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, observational study including 31 eyes from 26 patients who underwent either DSO (n = 16) or DMEK (n = 15) at the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Arruzafa. Patients were included if they had complete follow-up data at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. Their clinical information was collected from medical records and complementary tests, including the Snellen visual acuity test, Pentacam corneal tomography, and specular microscopy. Results: The average time to achieve best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was significantly longer for DSO (7.44 ± 2.3 months) than for DMEK (5.73 ± 1.9 months, p = 0.004). Complication rates were higher in the DMEK group (26.7%), and in comparison, there was an absence of complications in the DSO group (p = 0.043). Corneal endothelial cell migration was confirmed in patients who underwent DSO, with a mean cell density of 817.17 ± 91.7 cells/mm2 after one year. Conclusions: DSO effectively treated the selected patients with FECD who presented central guttata and corneal edema, achieving visual outcomes equivalent to those of DMEK while reducing complication rates. This technique eliminates the need for donor tissue and immunosuppressive medications, making it a viable alternative for specific cases.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Analysis of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Versus Descemetorhexis Without Keratoplasty (DSO) in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Date Crossref
09/07/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsGlaucoma and retinal disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.