P.080 Head circumference values among Inuit children in Nunavut, Canada: a retrospective cohort study
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Inuit children have been observed to have high rates of macrocephaly, which leads to burdensome travel for medical evaluation, often with no pathology identified. Given reports that WHO growth charts may not reflect all populations, we compared head circumference (HC) measurements in a cohort of Inuit children with the WHO charts. Methods: We extracted HC data from a retrospective cohort study where, with Inuit partnership, we reviewed medical records of Inuit children, born between 2010-2013, and residing in Nunavut. We excluded children with preterm birth, documented neurologic/genetic disease, and most congenital anomalies. We compared HC values with the 2007 WHO charts. Results: We analyzed records of 1960 Inuit children (8866 data points). Most data were from ages 0-36 months. At all age points, the cohort had statistically significantly larger HC than WHO medians. At age 12 months, median HC were 1.3 cm and 1.5 cm larger for male and female Inuit children. Using WHO growth curves, macrocephaly was overdiagnosed and microcephaly underdiagnosed. Conclusions: Our results support the observation that Inuit children from Nunavut have larger HCs, and use of the WHO charts may lead to overdiagnosis of macrocephaly and underdiagnosis of microcephaly. Population specific growth curves for Inuit children should be considered.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P.080 Head circumference values among Inuit children in Nunavut, Canada: a retrospective cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.