Characteristics, management and factors associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Burkina Faso: insights from a 2021 large-scale ambispective study
Rattachement africain : fr, br, Burkina Faso, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: To assess treatment and identify predictive factors of worsening in COVID-19 patients. Methods: This study was ambispective (both prospective and retrospective) and part of a multidisciplinary, multicenter project designed to generate epidemiological, sociological and anthropological data about the COVID-19 epidemic in Burkina Faso. Medical records of patients admitted for COVID-19 at the hospitals of Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso from March 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed. To identify predictive factors of severe complications, we used Poisson regression models. Results: In total, 1,511 patients were included, of whom 70% were aged ≤50 years, 59% were men and 97% were living in an urban area. Of the 86% of patients treated, 92.9% of them received the combo Azithromycin-hydroxychloroquine. A total of 78 (5.2%) patients experienced complications during hospitalization, and 49 (3.3%) patients died. Multivariate analysis identified patient's age, residence and comorbidity as factors associated with poor outcomes. Conclusions: Although most people had symptoms, most of them recovered without sequelae, and few patients had severe forms of disease. Age was a strong predictor of worse outcomes in this population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characteristics, management and factors associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Burkina Faso: insights from a 2021 large-scale ambispective study
- Date Crossref
- 10/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.