Decolonizing Artificial Intelligence: Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Epistemic Pluralism, and the Ethics of Technology
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper explores the epistemological critique and reimaginings of artificial intelligence (AI) offered by Indigenous scholars, technologists, and artists. Challenging the dominant logics of data extraction, computational efficiency, and universalist rationality. Indigenous epistemologies foreground relationality, land-based intelligence, and spiritual responsibility as foundations for ethical technological practice. Drawing on publicly available documents, digital platforms, and urban academic discourses, particularly from the vantage point of a non-Indigenous researcher based in Delhi, this study examines how Indigenous AI critiques circulate across transnational and urban contexts, and the tensions they provoke when translated into mainstream AI ethics. Methodologically, the paper employs critical discourse analysis and reflexive inquiry, informed by decolonial theory and Indigenous data governance principles. Rather than advocating for mere inclusion, it argues for epistemic pluralism and solidarity, urging a reorientation of AI from extractive to relational ontologies. The study contributes to the broader project of decolonizing technology by highlighting the responsibilities of non-Indigenous scholars in supporting epistemologies that challenge and reframe what AI can and should be.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Decolonizing Artificial Intelligence: Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Epistemic Pluralism, and the Ethics of Technology
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Fringe Global Scientific Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.