BASS

Le résumé fourni par la source

We present detailed morphological classifications for the hosts of 1189 hard X-ray selected (14–195 keV) active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from the Swift-BAT 105-month catalog as part of the BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS). BASS provides a powerful all-sky census of nearby AGNs, minimizing obscuration biases and providing a robust dataset for studying AGN-host galaxy connections. Classifications are based on a volunteer-based visual inspection workflow on the Zooniverse platform, adapted from the Galaxy Zoo DECaLS (GZD) project. Dual-contrast grz color composite images, generated from public surveys (e.g., NOAO Legacy Survey, Pan-STARRS, SDSS) and dedicated observations enabled key morphological features to be identified. Our analysis reveals that, with respect to a control sample of inactive galaxies, BASS AGN hosts show a deficiency of smooth elliptical galaxies (∼70%) and spiral galaxies with prominent arms (∼80%), while displaying an excess of mergers or disturbed systems (∼400%), and disk galaxies without a spiral structure (∼300%). These trends are found after controlling for redshift and i-band magnitude, which suggests a preference for AGN activity in gas-rich, dynamically disturbed environments or transitional disk systems. We also find a higher bar fraction among AGN hosts than in a control sample (∼50% vs. ∼30%). We further explore the relationships between AGN properties (e.g., X-ray luminosity, black hole mass, and Eddington ratio) and host morphology, and find that high-luminosity and high-accretion AGNs preferentially reside in smooth or point-like hosts. At the same time, lower-luminosity AGNs are more common in disk galaxies. These results underscore the importance of morphological studies in understanding the fueling and feedback mechanisms that drive AGN activity and their role in galaxy evolution. Our dataset provides a valuable benchmark for future multiwavelength surveys (e.g. LSST, Roman, and Euclid) and automated morphological classification efforts.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.