Aberrant neural activation during inhibitory control in girls with fragile X syndrome
Rattachement africain : us, mo. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a genetic condition associated with risk for deficits in executive function, especially response inhibition. Under a clinical setting, this study employs a mobile neuroimaging technique, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), to examine differences in inhibition-elicited neural activation between girls with FXS and a control group matched for age, cognitive function, and clinical symptoms. fNIRS data were collected from 42 girls with FXS and 31 controls during a go/nogo task, with valid data available from 35 and 30 respectively. Relative to the control group, girls with FXS showed higher brain activation (NoGo>Go) in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), angular gyrus, precentral gyrus, and left frontal pole, and lower activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, frontal pole, precentral cortex, middle temporal cortex, parietal lobe, and left superior temporal cortex. A significant positive correlation was found between DLPFC activation and response inhibition deficits in girls with FXS. Girls with FXS show abnormal neural activation in response to inhibitory stimulus. Aberrant neural activation in DLPFC in girls with FXS is associated with executive function deficits. fNIRS is established to allow participants to engage in a task in relatively more "real world" conditions compared to the scanner environment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Aberrant neural activation during inhibitory control in girls with fragile X syndrome
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.