The relationship between spousal empowerment, quality of life, and subjective wellbeing among disabled elderly
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: As rapidly ages, the number of disabled elderly is increasing, leading to lower quality of life and greater psychological stress. Aim: To explore the relationship between spousal empowerment, quality of life, and subjective wellbeing (SWB) among disabled elderly, providing insights and practical guidance for enhancing SWB in this demographic. Method: A convenience sampling approach was employed to select 332 disabled elderly and their spouses. Research tools included a demographic survey, the Barthel Index (BI), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment - Older Adults Version (WHOQOL-OLD), the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH), and the Main Caregivers' Empowerment Measurement (MCEM). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and AMOS. Result: = 0.032) as significant predictors of SWB. The results of testing the mediating role of spousal empowerment using the structural equation model show that quality of life directly predicted SWB with a path coefficient of 0.208 (95% CI: 0.065, 0.289). Spousal empowerment partially mediated the relationship between quality of life and SWB, with a mediation effect of 0.067 (95% CI: 0.026, 0.098). Conclusion: Both quality of life and spousal empowerment can positively influence the SWB of disabled elderly. Additionally, spousal empowerment partially mediates the relationship between quality of life and SWB.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The relationship between spousal empowerment, quality of life, and subjective wellbeing among disabled elderly
- Date Crossref
- 08/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.