Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Histopathological Gastric Biopsies Using Deep Learning Models

Le résumé fourni par la source

Traditionally, Helicobacter pylori (HP) gastritis has been diagnosed by pathologists through the examination of gastric biopsies using optical microscopy with standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. However, with the adoption of digital pathology, the identification of HP faces certain limitations, particularly due to insufficient resolution in some scanned images. Moreover, interobserver variability has been well documented in the traditional diagnostic approach, which may further complicate consistent interpretation. In this context, deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models are showing promising results in the automated detection of this infection in whole-slide images (WSIs). The aim of the present article is to detect the presence of HP infection from our own institutional dataset of histopathological gastric biopsy samples using different pretrained and recognized DCNN and AutoML approaches. The dataset comprises 100 H&E-stained WSIs of gastric biopsies. HP infection was confirmed previously using immunohistochemical confirmation. A total of 45,795 patches were selected for model development. InceptionV3, Resnet50, and VGG16 achieved AUC (area under the curve) values of 1. However, InceptionV3 showed superior metrics such as accuracy (97%), recall (100%), F1 score (97%), and MCC (93%). BoostedNet and AutoKeras achieved accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 scores less than 85%. The InceptionV3 model was used for external validation, and the predictions across all patches yielded a global accuracy of 78%. In conclusion, DCNN models showed stronger potential for diagnosing HP in gastric biopsies compared with the auto ML approach. However, due to variability across pathology applications, no single model is universally optimal. A problem-specific approach is essential. With growing WSI adoption, DL can improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce variability, and streamline pathology workflows using automation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.