Identification of bacteriophage DNA in human umbilical cord blood
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bacteriophages, viruses that parasitize bacteria, are abundant in the human microbiome and may influence human health, in part, through their interactions with bacterial hosts. Whether endogenous bacteriophages or their products are vertically transmitted from mother to fetus during human pregnancy is not known. Here, we searched for bacteriophage sequences from five bacteriophage databases (474,031 total sequences) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of paired maternal and umbilical cord blood samples from two independent cohorts. First, we sequenced cfDNA from 10 pairs of maternal and cord blood samples, including four pairs affected by preeclampsia. We validated our findings in a previously published dataset of 62 paired maternal and cord blood samples, including 43 pairs from preterm or chorioamnionitis-affected deliveries. We identified 94 and 596 bacteriophage sequences in maternal and cord blood cfDNA samples from the first and second cohort, respectively. We identified 58 phage sequences across maternal-infant dyads and 581 phage sequences that were unique to a single sample. We did not identify any phage sequences consistently associated with preeclampsia, preterm, or chorioamnionitis-affected samples. This study demonstrated the presence of bacteriophage DNA in human cord blood at birth, providing evidence that the human fetus is exposed to bacteriophage DNA in utero.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of bacteriophage DNA in human umbilical cord blood
- Date Crossref
- 08/07/2025
- Éditeur
- American Society for Clinical Investigation
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.