Type I interferon as a pre‐lupus marker in anti‐nuclear antibody‐associated childhood immune thrombocytopenic purpura
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Paediatric-onset anti-nuclear antibody-associated immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP-ANA+) is a pre-lupus condition. Interferon signature (IS) is a reliable method to measure interferon-stimulated gene expression which is commonly raised in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in adult pre-lupus cases. Between 2022 and 2024, IS analysis was performed on 61 children, 17 with ITP-ANA+, 15 with ITP-ANA-, 15 with SLE and 14 with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. IS was positive in 14/17 children (82%), with a median score of 17 (1.2-143). This median IS was significantly higher than in the ITP-ANA- group (2.8, 1-41, p = 0.03) and lower than in the SLE group (37.5, 2.1-129, p = 0.04). Among ITP-ANA+ children, IS elevation was associated with age >10 years at ITP diagnosis, newly diagnosed or persistent ITP, positive anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies and the absence of hydroxychloroquine treatment. Hydroxychloroquine significantly reduced IS values in three children with pre- and post-treatment scores available. The involvement of type I interferon signalling in childhood ITP-ANA+ highlights a distinct pathogenic pathway and IS appears as a pertinent biomarker to identify patients at risk of progression to SLE. The introduction of hydroxychloroquine in these patients could help prevent the high morbidity of SLE at adult age.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Type I interferon as a pre‐lupus marker in anti‐nuclear antibody‐associated childhood immune thrombocytopenic purpura
- Date Crossref
- 05/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.