Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Trends and Demographic Disparities in the Utilization of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the United States, 2008 to 2021

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is a valuable tool to monitor the neural axis during various procedures and guide intervention aimed at managing operative complications. The literature lacks large scale data on trends and demographic disparities in IONM use in the United States. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the 2008-2021 National Inpatient Sample. Hospitalizations for neurosurgical (spinal, craniotomy, carotid artery, cranial/peripheral nerve), cardiac/vascular, and head/neck/thyroid procedures were identified and stratified by IONM use. Logistic regression models were estimated to assess disparities and trends in IONM use. Multivariable models adjusted for patient- and facility-level characteristics. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2021, the rate of IONM use increased significantly in neurosurgical (3.69% to 18.62%, p < 0.001) and cardiac/vascular procedures (0.018% to 0.6%, p < 0.001). IONM use for head/neck/thyroid procedures increased steadily until 2014 and then declined ( p < 0.001). Compared with hospitalizations of White patients, Black (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.94) and Hispanic (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96) patients were associated with lower odds of IONM use during craniotomy. Lower incomes (0-25th quartile) were associated with lower odds of IONM use in both spinal (aOR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.88) and craniotomy procedures (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing demand for IONM to enhance the safety of various procedures, indicating a need for neurologists and technologists with this expertise. In addition, we found significant racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in IONM use. These findings can be valuable for health care administrators and policymakers to address disparities in the access to IONM.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Trends and Demographic Disparities in the Utilization of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the United States, 2008 to 2021
Date Crossref
02/07/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsMeningioma and schwannoma managementIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.