The long-term disease course of microscopic colitis: a European prospective incident cohort study
Rattachement africain : nl, se, es, dk, lt, bg, it, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The disease course of microscopic colitis is largely unknown and current knowledge is based on retrospective data. The aim of the PRO-MC Collaboration is to prospectively describe the long-term disease course and prognostic factors. METHODS: Incident patients of microscopic colitis were included in a prospective, European, multicenter, web-based registry. Data on patient characteristics, symptoms, treatment, and quality of life were systematically registered at baseline and during fixed follow-up intervals. Four disease course phenotypes were defined. RESULTS: Of 422 registered incident patients, 220 had a complete 5-year follow-up. After 5 years, 6% had a quiescent disease course, 54% achieved remission after treatment, 33% had a relapsing disease course, and 7% a chronic active disease course. Patients with a relapsing or chronic active disease course had a more impaired quality of life and were more often in need for long-term budesonide treatment. The disease course in the first year after diagnosis was the only predictor of the disease course. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic colitis is a chronic condition with relapsing or continuous disease course in nearly half of the patients during the first 5 years after diagnosis. The disease course in the first year predicts the long-term disease course.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The long-term disease course of microscopic colitis: a European prospective incident cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.