Long-term bisphosphonate use and femoral morphological changes in osteoporosis patients: a retrospective cohort study
Rattachement africain : cn, gb, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between long-term bisphosphonates use and morphological change in the femur. METHODS: 140 patients (97.1% female, 70.8 ± 8.7 years) with over 5-year BP use (8.1 ± 2.4 years) were matched 1:1 for age (± 3), same BMD status with patients as a control group. The primary outcome was femoral lateral bowing (FLB). The hip-knee-shaft angle (HKSA) and femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with the Control group, the femoral lateral bowing and hip-knee-shaft angle (5.9 ± 4.3° vs. 3.7 ± 1.7°; 6.6 ± 2.6° vs. 5.1 ± 1.5°, respectively) were significantly larger, while the femoral neck shaft angle was significantly lower (128.1 ± 3.4° vs. 129.3 ± 2.5°) in the BP group. The correlation analysis shows there is a positive correlation between the BP therapy time and FLB (r = 0.2566, P < 0.01), HKSA (r = 0.1353, P = 0.1325), while negative correlation between the BP therapy time and FNSA (r = - 0.1637, P = 0.0681) without significance, indicating that the longer BP therapy, the larger the lateral bowing of the femur. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who took bisphosphonates over 5 years have a larger femoral lateral bowing, hip-knee-shaft angle and a smaller femoral neck shaft angle than control patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term bisphosphonate use and femoral morphological changes in osteoporosis patients: a retrospective cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.