Intracranial Stimulation in Epilepsy as a Novel Approach for Mapping Psychiatric Circuits
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective To assess the feasibility of using stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes, implanted for invasive recording of the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy, to identify and validate novel Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) targets for psychiatric disorders. Methods SEEG data from 86 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted at the UK National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery were analysed (6,372 electrode contacts). Normative structural and functional connectomes were combined with meta-analytic functional maps to estimate the probability of each contact engaging networks associated with psychiatric symptoms. A linear model, developed using published data from 80 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treated with DBS, was used to validate the approach. Results Networks involved in reward processing emerged as the most promising DBS targets, with a predicted required sample size of 7 patients (range 4–33). Bipolar disorder was the next most feasible (22 patients; range 10–44), followed by depression (32; range 16–49) and anxiety (38; range 17–59). For other disorders, estimated sample sizes exceeded 40, indicating limited feasibility for single-centre studies. Conclusions This study provides preliminary support for using SEEG to map brain circuits underlying psychiatric symptoms. The method leverages routinely implanted electrodes in epilepsy to explore candidate DBS targets, supporting a network-guided strategy for personalised neuromodulation in neuropsychiatry.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intracranial Stimulation in Epilepsy as a Novel Approach for Mapping Psychiatric Circuits
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.