Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Inequities in Fee-for-Service Remuneration Affecting Rheumatologists and Patient-Centered Care Across Canada: An Environmental Scan

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
14Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objectives System structure (macro-level) health policy and payment methods directly impact provider (meso-level) and patient levels of the healthcare system. Identifying variations in funding remuneration of services can identify potential inequities in care. We compared fee-for-service reimbursement rates (and regulations/stipulations) that are available to rheumatologists across Canadian provinces. Methods We reviewed publicly available Physician Payment Schedules across provinces to derive key information on fee-for-service payment information for common rheumatology services (as of July 2024). Information extracted included several sections encompassing: consultations, office visits, special premiums for complexity/diagnoses, hospital services, multidisciplinary care, virtual care, procedures (including injections/arthrocentesis, point-of-care ultrasonography) and additional services (e.g. laboratory monitoring). We descriptively summarized data in a table and text. We assessed whether reimbursement structures support person-centeredness (access to care dimension). Results Compensation for consultations ranged widely, from $153.51 to $239.57 (Table). This was also apparent in follow-up visit payments ranging from $65.55 to $131.52 and are overall consistently reimbursed at a lower rate than initial consultations. Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario offer additional reimbursement (premiums) for certain complex rheumatic conditions, whereas Saskatchewan, Quebec, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador offer age-based premiums. Overall, inpatient consultation reimbursement rates are similar to in-office consultations. Virtual care is inconsistently funded across Canada with variations in stipulations and is often reimbursed at a lower rate than in-person care. Funding to support multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary care models is sparse, with only British Columbia and Quebec having a dedicated billing code to fund nursing co-managed care. The average (±standard deviation) rates for joint aspirations, steroid injections, image-guided aspiration/injection, bursa aspiration/injection and complex bursa/joint aspiration/injection are $28.02±8.73, $26.58±8.44, $34.00±12.93, $26.86±10.28 and $29.85±9.19 respectively. Point-of-care ultrasonography is only remunerated in Ontario and Quebec. Notable restrictions/stipulations that may impair patient-centered care included financially disincentivizing follow-up visits that occur within shorter intervals, and remunerating virtual visits at a lower amount, creating an inequitable disadvantage for patients experiencing barriers in accessing convenient/local rheumatology care. Inconsistencies in funding for multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary care, and procedures (e.g. ultrasonography) may contribute to variations in quality of care across Canada. Table. Provincial reimbursement for rheumatology consultations/follow-up visits Conclusion We identified large provincial variations in reimbursement rates for rheumatology services. Current fee-for-service structures raise health policy issues for funding equitable rheumatology services that require reducing pay disparities, removing restrictions/stipulations that impair person-centered care, and further optimizing standardization of health services across Canada.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Inequities in Fee-for-Service Remuneration Affecting Rheumatologists and Patient-Centered Care Across Canada: An Environmental Scan
Date Crossref
01/07/2025
Éditeur
The Journal of Rheumatology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Healthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.