A whale optimization algorithm with Q-learning and processing-sequence-based distance for solving distributed blocking multi-product batch plant scheduling with sequence-dependent set-up times
Rattachement africain : cn, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Batch processing is crucial in modern industries such as food processing and pharmaceuticals, with scheduling under blocking constraints posing a challenge. This study addresses distributed blocking batch plant scheduling with sequence-dependent set-up times. A mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed to represent the problem, and a novel whale optimization algorithm incorporating Q-learning and processing-sequence-based distance (QDWOA) is proposed. Population diversity significantly impacts the performance of evolutionary algorithms, making an effective diversity metric essential. Therefore, this study presents a processing-sequence-based distance (PSD) to quantify individual distances in the population and then defines a diversity metric, percentage population diversity (PPD), to evaluate population diversity. During the encircling prey phase, six neighbourhood strategies are proposed, and Q-learning is used to dynamically select the most appropriate strategy. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art metaheuristics. Moreover, the MILP problem is solved using CPLEX, yielding optimal solutions for 27 small-scale instances.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A whale optimization algorithm with Q-learning and processing-sequence-based distance for solving distributed blocking multi-product batch plant scheduling with sequence-dependent set-up times
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.