Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Retained Surgical Items in Korea: A Systematic Review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: Retained surgical items (RSIs), such as gauze, sponges, instruments, or devices inadvertently left in the body after surgery remain a preventable medical error despite advancements in surgical techniques and safety protocols. This review systematically analyzes the status of residual surgical foreign bodies reported in Korea.Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Koreamed, ScienceON, Medline, Embase, and Korean academic society journals using keywords such as “cottonoid,” “gossypiboma,” “textiloma,” “retained surgical item,” “instruments,” “needle,” “sponge,” “swab,” “retained foreign body,” and “object.” The internal validity of case reports was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports.Results: A total of 66 RSI cases were identified across 55 studies. Female patients accounted for 54.5% of the study population, with a median age of 52.5 years. Pain was the most common symptom (39.4%), followed by palpable masses (19.7%) and discomfort (19.7%). The median time to detection was 4.5 years; 31.8% were discovered within one year, and 37.9% were detected after 10 years. Gauze was the most frequently retained item (56.1%), followed by sponges/towels (19.7%); catheter fragments (9.1%); and drains, tubes, and sutures (4.5% each). Most patients (84.8%) were treated surgically, with endoscopic procedures accounting for 13.6%.Conclusion: RSIs continue to be an undesirable surgical complication, underscoring the ongoing need for comprehensive and multifaceted prevention strategies. Because RSIs cannot be prevented solely through surgical counting systems, effective prevention requires multidisciplinary collaboration among surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses. Future research on RSI prevention strategies could play a crucial role in enhancing patient safety in hospitals.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Retained Surgical Items in Korea: A Systematic Review
Date Crossref
30/06/2025
Éditeur
Korean Society for Quality in Health Care
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Anatomy and Medical Technology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.