Equity in neurogenomics: advancing Parkinson’s disease research in AfrAbia
Rattachement africain : my. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
One of the most prevalent and debilitating neurodegenerative disorders worldwide is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Nevertheless, the majority of genomic insights and therapeutic advancements have been disproportionately focused on populations of European ancestry, resulting in a critical knowledge deficit in under-represented regions such as AfrAbia—a culturally and genetically wealthy convergence of Africa and the Arab world. This review emphasises the pressing necessity of prioritising equity in neurogenomics by incorporating a variety of genomic data and translational frameworks within AfrAbian populations. We investigate the role of population-specific genetic variation, environmental exposures, and ancestral backgrounds in the development, progression, and therapeutic response to Parkinson’s disease. We emphasise the opportunities and challenges associated with the development of equitable, context-sensitive research frameworks by delineating the region’s current genomic resources, ongoing research initiatives, and emerging biobank infrastructures. The review also addresses the role of consortia like the AfrAbia PD Genomic Consortium in democratising neurogenomic discovery, as well as capacity development, ethical considerations, and cross-border collaborations. In addition to promoting inclusion, the bridging of the equity gap in PD genomics also improves the scientific rigour and global relevance of the struggle against neurodegeneration.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Equity in neurogenomics: advancing Parkinson’s disease research in AfrAbia
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Academia.edu Journals
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.