Validation of quantitative transport mapping (QTM) with an ex vivo perfused liver model
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of a deep learning-based quantitative transport mapping method (QTMnet) for measuring total tissue perfusion. METHODS: QTMnet obtains tissue perfusion parametric maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI images by training on simulated data. This data uses synthetic arterial and venous vasculature geometries with flow based on constrained constructive optimization. Gadolinium contrast agent distribution is governed by the transport-forward problem, allowing us to generate a synthetic concentration spacetime profile for a given flow, blood volume fraction, and boundary condition. Tissue flows determined by QTMnet were compared to those obtained with traditional perfusion quantification (Kety equation with Tofts generalization), which uses a global arterial input function. Their total flow accuracies were validated on explanted porcine livers that were connected to an MR compatible flow pump with specified total flow rate for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI experiments. RESULTS: The mean total flow error for QTMnet was -0.34% ± 16.21% with range [-24.79%, 23.96%], compared to -35.74% ± 36.30% [-77.28%, 29.87%] for the Kety method. QTMnet provides 72% lower mean absolute error than the Kety method (12.15% vs. 43.21%, a 3.6-fold reduction). CONCLUSION: The fluid mechanics-based QTMnet accurately estimates total tissue flow in liver explants.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Validation of quantitative transport mapping (QTM) with an ex vivo perfused liver model
- Date Crossref
- 28/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.