Kingdon's Multiple Streams Approach in the Global South: A Bibliometric Systematic Review
Rattachement africain : th, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT This study presents a bibliometric systematic literature review of the application of Kingdon's multiple streams approach (MSA) in policy research within the Global South. Using the Scopus database, we analyzed 98 articles published between January 2014 and May 2024, focusing on publication trends, co‐citation patterns, and thematic synthesis. The review identifies key policy domains, including health (34%), environment (19%), and governance (17%), and shows how global–local dynamics and policy entrepreneurs shape policy outcomes. Notable cases illustrate how policy entrepreneurs capitalize on windows of opportunity and how global institutions and multilevel governance structures frequently enable or constrain policy innovation. The findings identify critical gaps in the original MSA framework, such as its limited capacity to account for external actors, power dynamics, and centralized governance structures prevalent in many Global South contexts. By integrating bibliometric analysis with qualitative thematic synthesis, this study proposes theoretical refinements, including adding external influence streams and cultural‐religious filters, to enhance the applicability of the framework in diverse settings. These contributions provide a nuanced understanding of policymaking processes in resource‐constrained and complex environments, advancing both theoretical and practical approaches for addressing policy challenges in the Global South contexts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Kingdon's Multiple Streams Approach in the Global South: A Bibliometric Systematic Review
- Date Crossref
- 27/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.