LPerceptual Quality Assessment of AI Generated Content Videos: a Dataset and Benchmark
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) driven video generation has garnered significant attention due to advancements in large language model techniques. Thus, there is a great demand to explore the effectiveness of video quality assessment (VQA) models in evaluating the perceptual quality of AI-generated content (AIGC) videos and in optimizing video generation techniques. Therefore, in this paper, we try to systemically investigate the AIGC-VQA problem from both subjective and objective quality assessment perspectives. For the subjective perspective, we construct a Large-scale Generated Video Quality assessment (LGVQ) dataset, consisting of 2,808 AIGC videos generated by 6 video generation models using 468 carefully selected text prompts. We evaluate the perceptual quality of AIGC videos from three dimensions: spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-to-video alignment, which hold the utmost importance for current video generation techniques. For the objective perspective, we establish a benchmark for evaluating existing quality assessment metrics on the LGVQ dataset, which fully demonstrates the performance of current mainstream VQA methods in evaluating AIGV quality. We hope that this work can contribute to the advancement of AIGC video generation technology as well as the evaluation techniques for AIGC videos. The LGVQ dataset will release publicly.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- LPerceptual Quality Assessment of AI Generated Content Videos: a Dataset and Benchmark
- Date Crossref
- 25/05/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.