Registry of patients with post-traumatic bile duct strictures: results of 8 years of work
Rattachement africain : ru, kz, by, us, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In memory of L.I. Kurmanseitova, the initiator of this patient registry In 2016, an initiative group, in coordination with the leadership of the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association of Commonwealth of Independent States, established the "Registry of Patients with Post-Traumatic Bile Duct Strictures" with the aim of assessing long-term treatment outcomes and developing unified approaches to the management of patients with benign bile duct strictures and biliodigestive anastomoses. The registry was officially registered as a federal database. From 2016 to 2024, data on 426 patients were entered into the registry. In 72.8% of patients, the stricture developed after surgeries on the gallbladder and bile ducts. According to the registry data, 33.2% of patients underwent surgical treatment, 33.9% received interventional radiology procedures, 14.4% were treated endoscopically, and 17.8% underwent combined treatment methods. Long-term outcome data were available for 47.3% of patients. This work presents an analysis of treatment outcomes in this patient population based on the registry data. Further development of the registry with an expanded and more detailed database is planned, which will enable more in-depth and high-quality analysis, including the use of artificial intelligence.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Registry of patients with post-traumatic bile duct strictures: results of 8 years of work
- Date Crossref
- 27/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Annals of Surgical Hepatology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.